TREASON in America: It’s over! Foreign-born Domestic Enemy OBAMA CAUGHT in conspiracy to forge a certificate of live birth! Another criminal complaint expected to be filed with the FBI in days!

Thanks to Sharon Rondeau and Miki Booth for the heads up!

“Speaking today on the Alex Jones Show, investigative journalist Jerome R. Corsi dropped a huge bombshell. Dr. Corsi provided proof that he was alerted to an on-going plot to release a fake more than two months before President Obama released his purported long-form birth certificate.” (Link)

“Video: World Net Daily’s Dr. Jerome Corsi reports that he will be having a top expert file a criminal complaint with the FBI this week about  Obama’s newly forged birth certificate. “ (Another link)

Click on Robert Hefner's illustration for more

The Jury Laundry…formerly known as The Grand Jury…Another outlaw caught! Amy Reedy and Angela Davis frantically working to protect Pettway and the Process!

JAG HUNTER here with Sergeant of Marines Timothy Joseph Harrington:

The JURY LAUNDRY

In the days and posts ahead we’re going to  use the example of the Monroe County Tennessee  Jury Laundry to discuss and give examples regarding the scope and operation of modern day Jury Laundries found everywhere across America.

Jury-laundering

The Jury Laundry joins and converts innocent acts with innocent people transforming them into make-believe criminal acts and make-believe criminal actors.

Outlaw prosecutors and outlaw judges use the black-wash of innocents to populate their courtrooms as the objects of never-ending malicious, black-ball prosecutions.

The outlaw prosecutors and outlaw judges use the black-wash of The Jury Laundry to transform their malicious prosecutions into a form and forum that appears to be legitimate.

The Jury Laundry is a black-wash.

The Jury Laundry is no Jury at all.

The Jury Laundry used to be called The Grand Jury.

The Monroe County Tennessee Jury Laundry

Earlier today Helen Tansey posts in her “T-Room (click here)” published the first of what’s sure to become a series of reports regarding the events leading up to and executed earlier this month on Thursday, 3 June 2010.

Jury Laundrymen

Angela Davis is discovered as a second person illicitly judge-appointed into the 2010 Jury Laundry of Monroe County Tennessee.

Gary Pettway and Angela Davis serve together as two outlaw Jury Laundrymen.

Judge Amy Armstrong Reedy hand-picked Davis as the Foreman of the Monroe County Jury Laundry on 2 June 2010.

On 26 May 2010 a written order was issued to REEDY warning REEDY not to rig the jury (click here).

“Judicial interference or participation of any type or kind in the selection of the new Grand Jury or its foreman is fatal to the eventual vote of that Grand Jury constructed out of the need and necessity to examine and enforce the constitutionally lawful relationship between a judge and a jury.”

Reedy–a judge in the circuit criminal court–ignored the warning order. REEDY in her outlawry appointed Angela Davis as Foreman on 2 June 2010. Davis is one of the Jurors on the 2010 Jury Laundry (click here).

Tennessee State law commands that persons who’ve completed a term of jury service are prohibited from serving on any other Tennessee Jury for a period of 2-years (24-months).

Angela served as a Trial Juror for the first six-months of 2009 (click here – penultimate name on Panel #8).

Angela Davis’ jury service ended on 30 Jury 2009. Davis isn’t eligible to serve on another Tennessee Jury until 1 July 2011 (Click here: Tennessee Code Annotated 22-2-314).

And we know about Gary Pettway who serves illicitly on the 2010 Monroe County Jury Laundry with Davis.

Pettway served last year (like Davis) on a Tennessee Jury.

Pettway’s Jury term ended on 31 December 2009.

Pettway is  ineligible to serve on any Tennessee Jury until 1 January 2012.

Pettway’s first Jury term–as presently known–ended almost twenty-years ago on 31 December 1990.

But outlaw judges and prosecutors working with Pettway made sure Pettway never left the Jury Laundry.

Reedy promoted Davis from the Jury Laundry replacing Pettway as Foreman to protect Pettway and the Jury Laundry Process.

Davis and Pettway are co-workers…workmates.

Davis and Pettway are both criminals neither one of whom are allowed to sit on any 2010 Tennessee Jury.

And yet Davis and Pettway serve together on the 2010 Monroe County Jury Laundry not just as Jurors…but as Jury Foreman.

Davis’ assignment also went to protecting the Jury Laundry and its owners-operators such as Reedy from exposure to criminal consequence.

Human agency–the not so hidden hand of judicial jury tampering–stands as the only explanation finding Pettway and Davis standing together, serving together in the 2010 Monroe County Jury Laundry.

We’ll find other judge plants once we know their names.

Related links

J.B. Williams: A Right to Lawful Command (click here)

Helen Tansey – The T-Room: Operation American Freedom  (click here)

Helen Tansey – 1946 – The Year the Federal Government Illegally Usurped American’s Constitutional Protections (click here)

U.S. Grand Jury, Incorporated report on the Monroe County Tennessee Grand Jury (click here)

On the subject regarding indecent men… (click here)

The BIG LIE (click here):  Monroe County Advocate & Democrat running cover for the Jury Laundry (compare with Tenessee Code 22-2-314 below)!

Tennessee Code Annotated 22-2-314 (click here)

Note 1: Robert F. Cooper, Jr.–Tennessee’s Attorney General–notified today at 1333 hours. Point of contact is Marie (the receptionist) who refused to take the complaint. She refused also to transfer my call to anyone else. Marie the receptionist tells me Robert Cooper does not hold jurisdiction over the matters before us. Guess Tennessee Bureau of Investigation Special Agent Washington was wrong (I spoke to him in person Wednesday morning, 9 June 2010–Chattanooga office)

Note 2: Incumbent Tennessee Democrat Governor Phil Bredesen first appointed Amy Reedy into her criminal court judgeship back in January 2006 (click here). Bredesen is running for reelection in November this year.

More to follow…

A Robert Hefner illustration

Copyright 2002 – 2010 ©™ by The JAG HUNTER

Navy SEALs, Sergeant Hutchins Attainder Courts-martial updates

NAVY SEALS Second Class Petty Officer Matthew McCabe, Second Class Petty Officer Johnathan Keefe, & First Class Petty Officer Julio Huertas, Jr.

“Charging the Navy SEALS sends the wrong message to both our troops and to the terrorists. How can we ask our bravest, most elite troops to carry out dangerous missions for our sake, and then have our own government charge them with crimes and threaten to punish them for doing their jobs? How can we expect them to do their jobs with the threat of court-martial over their heads?” asked Gonzalez.

More…

Marine Sergeant Lawrence Gordon Hutchins, III

Monday, 15 March 2010 full-board disciplinary officer hearing set for Marine Sergeant Lawrence Gordon Hutchins, III.

Defense JAG, Marine Captain Kaza reports:

“En Banc” just means that the entire Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals will sit in judgment of this case. There are roughly 12 judges assigned to the Court. Normally, an appeal will only be considered by a panel of 3 judges. But for cases that are deemed significantly important, they will sit “En Banc,” which means all of them will consider it. From my recollection, this Court only considers cases “en banc” roughly 2-3 times per year, out of the hundreds of cases they consider. This does not necessarily mean they are leaning toward the prosecution or defense, it just means that they consider the legal issues raised by Sgt Hutchins’ appeal to be very important.

The hearing on March 15 is an “oral argument.” That is where counsel for both sides of an appeal have the opportunity to address the appellate judges regarding technical points of law. As this case is being considered “En Banc” all of the judges assigned to the Court will be present for the argument. The judges will usually ask several questions, to help flesh out their position on a legal issue. It is very different from a trial, as it is not as much about emotion or rhetorical skill (although that can be important), as it is about knowledge of case precedents and how they should or shouldn’t apply to the facts of the case. The oral argument is more of a technical tool for the judges to help them analyze a case than it is a “closing argument” which will convince them whether to reverse or affirm a conviction.

I wouldn’t expect them to issue their decision for at least another month after that, if not longer.

If we lose the appeal before the Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals (which is statistically likely), then we can appeal to the highest military court, the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. That Court is made up of 5 civilian judges, appointed by the President for terms of 15 years. After that is a potential appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Former Marine Judge Advocate, Marines, Brigadier General David Brahms adds this:

It is a big deal for the [Navy/Marine Corps Military Disciplinary Review Board] as a whole (all twelve members) to agree to hear the case as in Larry’s situarion. It is rare. In most cases a [smaller panel] of the whole [Board] hears the case. The EN BANC decision means there is a big issue and the [Board] is convinced it required special attention. I caution it is not evidence [Sergeant Hutchins] will win.